Wow, what a game last night. Incredible comeback by the Colts and a decision that will be talked about for a long time to come.
With just over 2 minutes left and a 6-pt lead, Bill Belichick decided to go for it on 4th and 2, deep in the Pats end of the field. The gambit failed giving Peyton Manning and the Colts a short field for the game-winning TD.
So, I want to jump all over Belichick for this one because, mainly, I can’t stand the Pats. I respect them, but can’t stand them.
But, I have to admit that my immediate thought, before a day of contemplating and listening to Sports Talk, was, “They’ll pick this (the first down) up no problem and that’ll be the game.” So, all other things being equal, I’ve got to concede that it wasn’t a horrible decision. But, I still disagree with it.
At it’s core, the decision was this: What do you have more confidence in, Tom Brady and the Offense’s ability to pick up 2 yards, or the Defense stopping Peyton Manning from driving the length of the field in two minutes? Hard to fault a guy for gambling on Brady.
Statistically it was the right decision: Yeah, I’ve seen the equations that mathematically “prove” Belichick made the correct decision. Put your slide rules away geeks. It’s a good point if you get to make the decision 10,000 times. The only problem is, you only get one crack at it. And the downside was incredible. This game may well turn out to have a huge impact on the AFC Playoff Picture.
Yeah, but Belichick has more rings than you: Agreed, BB has forgotten more about football than I’ll ever know. But I do know one thing: He didn’t win those rings with defenses that he couldn’t trust, and while he may be unconventional, Belichick didn’t win titles by taking excessive gambles like this.
About that Defense: Here’s the sure loss in Belichick’s decision. Whether or not the play succeeded, the coach announced loud and clear that he has no confidence in his defense. Here again, this may not be the last we’ve heard of this. The Pats may face Manning again … what then? What do you say to the D when you’re prepping for that one?
Arrogance: Was it really about the defense? Part of me wonders if this wasn’t pure arrogance. Belichick is a mad genius, but at times he does make decisions that are fraught with unnecessary risk. Take two seasons ago when he was leaving his healthy QB in games that were essentially over just to run up the score. I think that in part there is simply an arrogance there. A sense that he can make whatever ridiculous decision and move it to success by the sheer force of his will. He’s the NFL’s version of Obama, except that Belichick has a clue and most of what he does works.
The Time Out: A testimony to how unexpected this move was was the Pats own unpreparedness. Belichick was forced to take his final time out, which I think doomed the play. Had they just run the play without giving the Colts an opportunity to gear up, they would have had a better chance of success.
The Insurance Concept: This really isn’t about the offense any more than insurance is about the odds of you getting into a wreck. Brady’s proficiency is irrelevant. Even the head coaches of the league’s worst teams would probably feel confident that most times their teams could man up and grab two yards. And, you may well drive the rest of your life without filing a claim on your auto policy. This is about the downside. If you do wreck, or if the team fails, the consequences are huge. You were nervous about Peyton Manning having two minutes to drive 70 or 80 yards. Sure, maybe he can do that. But two minutes to drive 30 yards … yeah, that’s darn near a sure thing.
So, I can’t crucify Belichick for this one, but I do respectfully disagree with the call.