On Arrogance
Honestly, I’m getting sick of posting on this general topic. However, the fallout from recent events has brought to a head a lot of the frustration that this voter has been feeling for the last year. Not the last two years. Not the last eight years. The last, single, year. It is arrogance that inspires my angst.
Now this word, arrogance, is thrown around a lot in political talk. I’m here to discuss what it means to me, but my guess is that I’m not alone in my definition.
For me, arrogance refers to the attitude in Washington, and especially with our President, that says, “We know better that you do what is in your best interest.”
And despite being taken to the woodshed in Massachusetts, President Obama appears not to have the first idea that this kind of arrogance is part of his problem. Excerpts from his interview with George Stephanopoulos after the Massachusetts special election …
“People are angry, and they’re frustrated. Not just because of what’s happened in the last year or two years, but what’s happened over the last eight years.”
Let’s just ignore the tired “Blame Bush” strategy. This is classic Obama. Polling of the voters in Massachusetts made it abundantly clear that Brown’s victory was a repudiation, not solely of Obama, but definitely of specific events that have been part of the past year’s orgy of appropriation in our nation’s Capitol. Still here is Obama, helping the voters understand why they voted the way they did, just in case they didn’t know. See, our President the narcissist believes that he can say anything and make it be so through the sheer force of his personality.
“If there’s one thing that I regret this year, is that we were so busy just getting stuff done and dealing with the immediate crises that were in front of us, that I think we lost some of that sense of speaking directly to the American people about what their core values are …”
This was the telling one. Is he suggesting he embarked on the past year’s grand agenda without knowing or considering the values of the American people. Doubtful. He didn’t suggest listening to the American people. He suggested talking to them. So I believe his point is far more sinister than that. He regrets that he didn’t do a good enough job of telling us what our values are or should be. Again, he believes that through artful persuasion he can change the core of a man. Frankly, that arrogance pisses me off.
If you look behind a lot of what the President has undertaken this year you’ll see that these aren’t isolated issues that needed fixing. He is seeking to impose a fundamental change in how Americans act and what they value. For example, he blatantly seeks to undermine the corporate leaders and prop up unions. Through “Cash for Clunkers” he attempted to prop up a union-dominated industry in a not too subtle way, by paying citizens to buy new cars. The last handout attached to the now faltering health care initiative was the exemption for union members. This wasn’t just to curry favor for the bill. It was to create a situation that would incentivize union membership. Screw “Card Check.” Who needs intimidation when bribery will do the trick?
Of course, in the words above and throughout the interview he repeated that he feels he just didn’t do a good enough job of explaining x to the American people. For the love of God, NO! Does this mean that now he’s going to do even more talking? On the contrary, it’s high time for President Obama to shut up and listen!
Thankfully he won’t … even to save his own skin.



