<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>TSW2</title>
	<atom:link href="http://tsw2.brianjb.net/Index.php?feed=rss2" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://tsw2.brianjb.net</link>
	<description>Just another WordPress weblog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 27 Jul 2010 02:42:07 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Fitness Reporter: Just Plain Wrong</title>
		<link>http://tsw2.brianjb.net/?p=1158</link>
		<comments>http://tsw2.brianjb.net/?p=1158#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Jul 2010 02:42:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>brian</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TV]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tsw2.brianjb.net/?p=1158</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This is lame … &#160; … and this is laughably stupid (I mean, it’s Tony Little, what more do you expect?) … &#160; … but this, is just plain wrong …]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is lame …</p>
<div style="padding-bottom: 0px; margin: 0px; padding-left: 0px; padding-right: 0px; display: inline; float: none; padding-top: 0px" id="scid:5737277B-5D6D-4f48-ABFC-DD9C333F4C5D:9c7f9459-a26b-47b9-944f-76d4bfbae9a6" class="wlWriterEditableSmartContent">
<div><object width="425" height="355"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/ISH3CYZfYFk&amp;hl=en_US&amp;fs=1&amp;hl=en"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/ISH3CYZfYFk&amp;hl=en_US&amp;fs=1&amp;hl=en" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="425" height="355"></embed></object></div>
</div>
<p>&#160;</p>
<p>… and this is laughably stupid (I mean, it’s Tony Little, what more do you expect?) …</p>
<div style="padding-bottom: 0px; margin: 0px; padding-left: 0px; padding-right: 0px; display: inline; float: none; padding-top: 0px" id="scid:5737277B-5D6D-4f48-ABFC-DD9C333F4C5D:52624161-c7ab-4ac8-8dd9-d77b9d497b0d" class="wlWriterEditableSmartContent">
<div><object width="425" height="355"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/pyK-3Em8__c&amp;hl=en_US&amp;fs=1&amp;hl=en"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/pyK-3Em8__c&amp;hl=en_US&amp;fs=1&amp;hl=en" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="425" height="355"></embed></object></div>
</div>
<p>&#160;</p>
<p>… but this, is just plain wrong …</p>
<div style="padding-bottom: 0px; margin: 0px; padding-left: 0px; padding-right: 0px; display: inline; float: none; padding-top: 0px" id="scid:5737277B-5D6D-4f48-ABFC-DD9C333F4C5D:af27f36b-f3fe-4ed8-bb67-3ef1c66956f6" class="wlWriterEditableSmartContent">
<div><object width="425" height="355"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/xXHUdvvHTkw&amp;hl=en_US&amp;fs=1&amp;hl=en"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/xXHUdvvHTkw&amp;hl=en_US&amp;fs=1&amp;hl=en" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="425" height="355"></embed></object></div>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://tsw2.brianjb.net/?feed=rss2&amp;p=1158</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>World Cupdate:  I&#8217;m Laughing</title>
		<link>http://tsw2.brianjb.net/?p=1155</link>
		<comments>http://tsw2.brianjb.net/?p=1155#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Jun 2010 23:48:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>brian</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tsw2.brianjb.net/?p=1155</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I’m already weary from being told how important the World Cup is, and all of the hand-wringing over the tragedy that America isn’t more of a soccer power.&#160; Good thing is, I’m having a laugh at these folks because, after all the pompous chest-beating about soccer, they are now committed to watching this boredom. With [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I’m already weary from being told how important the World Cup is, and all of the hand-wringing over the tragedy that America isn’t more of a soccer power.&#160; Good thing is, I’m having a laugh at these folks because, after all the pompous chest-beating about soccer, they are now committed to watching this boredom.</p>
<p>With two matches in the books we have two ties and a grand total of two goals.&#160; In three freaking hours of play, two goals and not a winner in site.&#160; You’re right all you America-hating Euro-geeks.&#160; I don’t begin to grasp the subtle nuances of a scoreless tie.&#160; I’ll just take your word for it that, as scoreless ties go, this one was a blockbuster and uber-important.</p>
<p>Soccer isn’t the thinking man’s game, it’s the sleeping man’s game.&#160; You can work in a decent nap and miss nothing.</p>
<p>No gang, I like my football with helmets, pads, scoring and a victor at the end of the day.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://tsw2.brianjb.net/?feed=rss2&amp;p=1155</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>NCAA:  For the Record</title>
		<link>http://tsw2.brianjb.net/?p=1153</link>
		<comments>http://tsw2.brianjb.net/?p=1153#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2010 16:12:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>brian</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Sports]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tsw2.brianjb.net/?p=1153</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Yikes. Busy day / week at work so I haven&#8217;t had a lot of time to spend on this. But here, for the record, are my picks &#8230; MIDWEST: Kansas, UNLV, Maryland, New Mex St, Ohio St, OK St, GTown, San Diego St (upset). Kansas, Maryland, OK St (upset), GTown. Kansas over GTown. WEST: Syracuse, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yikes.  Busy day / week at work so I haven&#8217;t had a lot of time to spend on this.  But here, for the record, are my picks &#8230; </p>
<p>MIDWEST:<br />
Kansas, UNLV, Maryland, New Mex St, Ohio St, OK St, GTown, San Diego St (upset).<br />
Kansas, Maryland, OK St (upset), GTown.<br />
Kansas over GTown.</p>
<p>WEST:<br />
Syracuse, Florida St (9 over 8), Vandy, UTEP (upset, the dreaded 5/12), K State, Florida (upset), Pitt, Minnesota (upset).<br />
Syracuse, Vandy, K State, Pitt.<br />
Syracuse over Pitt (Pitt reaching Regional, mild upset).</p>
<p>EAST:<br />
Kentucky, Texas, Wisconsin, Temple, WVU, Missouri (upset), New Mexico, Marquette<br />
Kentucky, Wisconsin, WVU, Marquette (upset)<br />
West Virginia over Kentucky (upset)  OK, I can envision Kentucky doing well, but I just can&#8217;t bring myself to put it down on paper.  Besides, I think WVU is coming in with a burr in their saddle.</p>
<p>SOUTH:<br />
Duke, Louisville (slight upset), Purdue, Texas A&#038;M, Villanova, St Mary&#8217;s (upset), Baylor, Notre Dame<br />
Duke, Texas A&#038;M (slight upset), Villanova, Notre Dame (upset)<br />
Villanova over Duke (slight upset).</p>
<p>FINAL FOUR:<br />
Kansas over Syracuse<br />
Villanova over WVU<br />
Villanova over Kansas for the Championship.</p>
<p>So, only one 5/12 upset pick.  A lot of major love.  A lot of Big East love.  And I won&#8217;t mind a bit if a couple of upstarts take out Duke and Kentucky early and screw up my undercard.  It would be a small price to pay for that joy.  That said, I would hardly consider Kentucky&#8217;s potential second-round opponent Texas an upstart.  The committee didn&#8217;t do the Cats any favors there.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://tsw2.brianjb.net/?feed=rss2&amp;p=1153</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Handicapping Celebrity Apprentice</title>
		<link>http://tsw2.brianjb.net/?p=1152</link>
		<comments>http://tsw2.brianjb.net/?p=1152#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Mar 2010 00:44:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>brian</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RealiTV]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TV]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[celebrityapprentice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Trump]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tsw2.brianjb.net/?p=1152</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[After a bit of a sabbatical, back to blogging. For the record, before it begins, here is my initial handicap of this season’s Celebrity Apprentice. First off, general thoughts.&#160; The first season of Celebrity Apprentice was awesome because you had some really colorful personalities.&#160; There was a touch of nasty with the Piers – Omarosa [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>After a bit of a sabbatical, back to blogging.</p>
<p>For the record, before it begins, here is my initial handicap of this season’s Celebrity Apprentice.</p>
<p>First off, general thoughts.&#160; The first season of Celebrity Apprentice was awesome because you had some really colorful personalities.&#160; There was a touch of nasty with the Piers – Omarosa feud, but then you also had some great entertainment with diverse and fun personalities.&#160; Gene Simmons was my favorite celebrity ever in a Celebrity something-or-other show.</p>
<p>Last season was exhausting.&#160; What appeared to be another mix of terrific personalities quickly degenerated into a week in and week out cat fight.&#160; Turns out the women were strong but not pleasantly so, and the men were soft … other than Dennis Rodman for whom CA became a trailer for his appearance on Celebrity Rehab with Dr Drew.</p>
<p>Once again in looking over the list it seems like this could be a great season featuring a diverse and entertaining group.&#160; But as we’ve seen, you never really know how it’s going to evolve until you mix them all together in a batch of boardroom stew.</p>
<p>So, for the individuals and my general prognosis …</p>
<p><strong>Summer Sanders:</strong>&#160; (olympic swimmer)&#160; Athletes have tended to be rather passive and soft-spoken on CA.&#160; Perhaps it’s because this isn’t their type of competition.&#160; Early out.</p>
<p><strong>Sinbad:</strong>&#160; (comedian, actor)&#160; I don’t know.&#160; It’s hard to take the guy seriously.&#160; But I can see him being one of those generally pleasant people who manage to stay under the radar for a while.&#160; Middle of the pack.</p>
<p><strong>Michael Johnson:</strong>&#160; (olympic track star)&#160; See Summer Sanders comments.&#160; Early out.</p>
<p><strong>Daryl Strawberry:</strong>&#160; (former pro baseball player)&#160; Straw is more than just an athlete.&#160; He is a larger than life personality.&#160; Since then he has also confronted his personal demons and written a lively tell all book about his days with the Mets.&#160; Hard to tell how this one will go.&#160; Can he still trade on his star power, or will he have the cautious demeanor of a recovering addict.&#160; Middle of the pack.</p>
<p><strong>Selita Ebanks:</strong>&#160; (Victoria’s Secret model)&#160; Hmm … eye candy on Trump’s show?&#160; No way.&#160; Obviously each case is different, however this type of candidate tends to get by on their “charm” which disguises their lack of initiative and creativity.&#160; Unless there is a driven Annie Duke type who wants to use her for a pawn, Ebanks is probably an early out.</p>
<p><strong>Maria Kanellis:</strong>&#160; (former WWE Diva)&#160; Another one that’s hard to peg.&#160; Is she an athlete?&#160; Is she eye candy?&#160; Coming from WWE, she’s got to understand the marketing thing.&#160; Upper middle of the pack.</p>
<p><strong>Holly Robinson Peete:</strong>&#160; (actress, philanthropist, on air personality)&#160; OK, I have a tough time with this one.&#160; I know her from <em>21 Jump Street</em> which was waaay back.&#160; Generally long ago celebs don’t fare will in things like this.&#160; It’s like they’ve adjusted to being out of the limelight.&#160; However I do see that Peete has experience in non-profit fund-raising which is one of the primary skills demanded on CA.&#160; Upper middle of the pack.</p>
<p><strong>Cyndi Lauper:</strong>&#160; (singer)&#160; Lauper strikes me as the strong artistic type.&#160; An artist is generally not a candidate to win the whole thing, but can be a valuable creative force that teammates will want to keep around.&#160; Contender.</p>
<p><strong>Bret Michaels:</strong>&#160; (rock star, Poison)&#160; Without any buxom, blonde, brain-dead teeny-boppers Michaels could be out of this league.&#160; However, <em>Rock of Love</em> revived his career so he’s got some star power in the bank.&#160; Middle of the pack.</p>
<p><strong>Carol Leifer:</strong>&#160; (comedienne)&#160; I could see Carol rocking this show.&#160; She is hilarious and strikes me as the kind of person who is probably just as sharp and appealing when she isn’t on stage.&#160; Serious Contender.</p>
<p><strong>Curtis Stone:</strong>&#160; (celebrity chef)&#160; I really don’t know the guy.&#160; A chef has to know something about business and marketing and should be able to bring some creativity to the table so I’ll give him some benefit of the doubt.&#160; Middle of the pack.</p>
<p><strong>Goldberg:</strong>&#160; (actor, pro wrestler)&#160; Again, those sport entertainment folks have to know the marketing and star power game well.&#160; Middle of the pack?</p>
<p><strong>Rod Blagojevich:</strong>&#160; (former governor of Illinois) … and major sleazeball.&#160; On the one hand he’s probably got a skill set that could serve him well on CA.&#160; On the other I can just seem him taking some unethical shortcut that will piss the Donald off prompt one of his patented immediate firings.&#160; He (the Donald) found out about Khloe Kardashian’s past DUI and had no mercy.&#160; I guess a history of abuse of power and corruption is ok?&#160; Middle of the pack.</p>
<p><strong>Sharon Osbourne:</strong>&#160; (TV star, music manager and Ozzy’s wife)&#160; This my pick.&#160; You can just see her taking this whole season over much like Piers did two years ago.&#160; And the bonus is, she can be strong and entertaining at the same time.&#160; Seeing her name on the list gave me real hope for this season.</p>
<p>So, I guess just looking at it person by person I came up with Sharon Osbourne and Carol Leifer as my top two.&#160; I could also see Blagojevich in the finals.&#160; Especially if the Donald is angling for a man vs. woman finale, which we haven’t had yet on CA.&#160; Blagojevich definitely has the strongest potential of the guys.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://tsw2.brianjb.net/?feed=rss2&amp;p=1152</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>For the Record:  Indy by 10</title>
		<link>http://tsw2.brianjb.net/?p=1151</link>
		<comments>http://tsw2.brianjb.net/?p=1151#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Feb 2010 22:49:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>brian</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Sports]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IndianapolisColts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NewOrleansSaints]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PeytonManning]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tsw2.brianjb.net/?p=1151</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[OK, for the record, my pick in the Super Bowl:&#160; Colts by 10, in a high-scoring affair. Set aside the end of the regular season when the Colts and Saints were resting.&#160; Look at the two teams’ run in the playoffs.&#160; Indianapolis has rolled through two stout defenses while two weeks ago New Orleans needed [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>OK, for the record, my pick in the Super Bowl:&#160; Colts by 10, in a high-scoring affair.</p>
<p>Set aside the end of the regular season when the Colts and Saints were resting.&#160; Look at the two teams’ run in the playoffs.&#160; Indianapolis has rolled through two stout defenses while two weeks ago New Orleans needed overtime to beat a team that turned the ball over 5 times.</p>
<p>The Saints’ strategy will be to punish Peyton Manning as they did Brett Favre.&#160; Good strategy if you can make it a reality, but bad idea to talk about it.&#160; First of all, if there is a quarterback the refs will protect more than Brett Favre, it’s Peyton Manning.&#160; Second, the day after New Orleans made their defensive game-plan known, the NFL came out and admitted that the Saints should have been flagged for one of their more egregious hits on Favre.&#160; If you put Manning on the ground today, it had better be super clean.</p>
<p>All that aside, I don’t think New Orleans can pressure the QB in a game-changing way.&#160; Indy has a decent line and Manning is second to none in his ability to read, adjust at the line and get rid of the ball quickly.&#160; You won’t get to Manning with your base package and when you blitz he’ll find the open man.</p>
<p>I see Indy coming out and playing their game.&#160; A lot of no huddle, and surgical precision.</p>
<p>So it will be the Saints’ challenge to try and keep up.&#160; And that’s where it gets interesting.&#160; You can’t look past New Orleans’ offense.&#160; I don’t think the Colts “D” can shut them down.&#160; But I do think they can come up with enough stops to give Peyton Manning breathing room.&#160; The potential absence or reduced effectiveness of Dwight Freeney made me dial my pick back from two touchdowns.</p>
<p>Aside from the analysis, I also shudder to imagine the love-fest and avalanche of political correctness that will be unleashed should the Saints win.&#160; If you’ve lost your home or are still struggling to get your business back on its feet after 4 1/2 years, a month from now is it really going to make a difference who won the Super Bowl?&#160; Don’t let the blabbering mouths deceive you with overestimations of the importance of the sport from which they derive their livelihood.&#160; Big game.&#160; Exciting.&#160; But next week we’ll be talking about who is on the bubble for March Madness.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://tsw2.brianjb.net/?feed=rss2&amp;p=1151</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>NFL Notes (i.e. Favre Notes with Bonus Features)</title>
		<link>http://tsw2.brianjb.net/?p=1150</link>
		<comments>http://tsw2.brianjb.net/?p=1150#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Jan 2010 05:47:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>brian</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Sports]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tsw2.brianjb.net/?p=1150</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Warning:&#160; This could well degenerate into an extended Favre rant … we’ll see. First of all, I must concede.&#160; Coming into this season, I fully expected to see NY Jets Favre, or 2nd last Packer season Favre this year.&#160; I figured him for 50/50 picks/TD’s.&#160; And I didn’t see him lasting the whole season.&#160; Couldn’t [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Warning:&#160; This could well degenerate into an extended Favre rant … we’ll see.</p>
<p>First of all, I must concede.&#160; Coming into this season, I fully expected to see NY Jets Favre, or 2nd last Packer season Favre this year.&#160; I figured him for 50/50 picks/TD’s.&#160; And I didn’t see him lasting the whole season.&#160; Couldn’t have been more wrong.&#160; This season was a smash, and even more so when you consider the age factor.</p>
<p>That said, the old gunslinger showed up just in time to save Packer fan from two weeks, and possibly an entire off-season of miserable Favre over-exposure.&#160; Sure, there is plenty of blame to go around.&#160; Had “All Day” managed to hang on to the ball that last drive might have been irrelevant.&#160; The sudden shift to conservative mode in that series didn’t help.&#160; 12 men in the huddle set Favre up.&#160; But!&#160; Up to that moment the Vikings were still in position to ice a trip to the Super Bowl in the closing seconds of regulation.&#160; Alas, this was not the first, or even the second time that a Favre-led team’s final play of the season on offense resulted in an interception.&#160; Thank you, football gods.</p>
<p>&#8211; B &#8211;</p>
<p>So now begins the annual “Will Favre retire?” off-season circus.&#160; The really awesome thing is that no one, not even Favre himself, could say anything to squelch this noise.&#160; God Himself could descend on halftime at the Super Bowl and announce Favre’s plans and no one would believe it.&#160; LOL!!&#160; Enjoy it Minnesota.&#160; You get what you pay for.</p>
<p>&#8211; B &#8211;</p>
<p>For a serious analysis of the prospects … Even if Favre were in his prime, expecting another season like this one would be quite a reach.&#160; Only Manning and Brady can turn in seasons like that year after year.&#160; In addition, Green Bay and Chicago are on the rise.&#160; The Vikings’ schedule will be tougher.</p>
<p>On the other hand, whether or not Favre is wiped out right now is irrelevant.&#160; It has been years … YEARS since Favre didn’t feel like retiring at this time of the year.&#160; Next August he’ll be rested.&#160; The whole world will be talking about football.&#160; He’ll get that itch.</p>
<p>Brad Childress has said he won’t put a deadline on Favre’s decision.&#160; Wow.&#160; Generous of him.&#160; Like deadlines have ever accomplished anything with Favre.&#160; And besides, isn’t Childress the guy who picked Favre up at the airport, halfway through the pre-season last Summer?</p>
<p>Minnesota is playing with fire.&#160; A lot of things are forgotten when a team wins 13 games.&#160; If the Vikings were to start out next season by losing a couple of games, let’s see how many players would forget that Favre was kicking back at home while they were puking in the summer sun.</p>
<p>&#8211; B &#8211;</p>
<p>How many playoff games has Aaron Rodgers won?&#160; Wow, am I getting sick of hearing this one.&#160; Comparing an 18-yr vet to a 2-yr starter?&#160; Rodgers compares favorably to Favre at the same point in his career, and he is far ahead of prime time Favre in the reckless department.</p>
<p>&#8211; B &#8211;</p>
<p>Do you know where your QB is?&#160; To me this is the major issue here.&#160; Do you know who your QB will be two seasons from now?&#160; A team either knows this, or has a problem that will preclude major success.&#160; Green Bay knows who their QB of the future is.&#160; So do the NY Jets.&#160; Minnesota?&#160; We won’t know who their 2010 signal caller is until kickoff in the regular season.&#160; Two years from now?&#160; It’s a good bet he’s not on their current roster.&#160; </p>
<p>&#8211; B &#8211;</p>
<p>Moving on … would they give up on the Pro Bowl already.&#160; After this season, the league’s “All Star” game will feature neither Peyton Manning nor Drew Breese?&#160; Ridiculous.&#160; This concept just doesn’t work with Pro Football.&#160; The sport is so physical that each contest takes its toll on all who participate.&#160; Risk of injury makes a mid-season classic impossible.&#160; And by the time the season is over, everyone is out of gas.</p>
<p>&#8211; B &#8211;</p>
<p>Finally, I’m picking the Colts.&#160; Prior to the Conference Championships my thought was that whoever came out of the NFC would be my overwhelming favorite.&#160; But, I was expecting Indy to struggle with the Jets.&#160; Actually, the Colts are playing their best football of the season right now.&#160; Credit the Jets “D.”&#160; They did a good job of curtailing Wayne and Clark.&#160; Manning was still able to carve them up.&#160; And I don’t see Indy helping the Saints out with massive turnovers.</p>
<p>Either way I’m really looking forward to the game.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://tsw2.brianjb.net/?feed=rss2&amp;p=1150</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>On Arrogance</title>
		<link>http://tsw2.brianjb.net/?p=1149</link>
		<comments>http://tsw2.brianjb.net/?p=1149#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Jan 2010 01:11:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>brian</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tsw2.brianjb.net/?p=1149</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Honestly, I’m getting sick of posting on this general topic.&#160; However, the fallout from recent events has brought to a head a lot of the frustration that this voter has been feeling for the last year.&#160; Not the last two years.&#160; Not the last eight years.&#160; The last, single, year.&#160; It is arrogance that inspires [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Honestly, I’m getting sick of posting on this general topic.&#160; However, the fallout from recent events has brought to a head a lot of the frustration that this voter has been feeling for the last year.&#160; Not the last two years.&#160; Not the last eight years.&#160; The last, single, year.&#160; It is arrogance that inspires my angst.</p>
<p>Now this word, arrogance, is thrown around a lot in political talk.&#160; I’m here to discuss what it means to me, but my guess is that I’m not alone in my definition.</p>
<p>For me, arrogance refers to the attitude in Washington, and especially with our President, that says, “We know better that you do what is in your best interest.”</p>
<p>And despite being taken to the woodshed in Massachusetts, President Obama appears not to have the first idea that this kind of arrogance is part of his problem.&#160; Excerpts from his interview with George Stephanopoulos after the Massachusetts special election …</p>
<blockquote><p>“People are angry, and they&#8217;re frustrated. Not just because of what&#8217;s happened in the last year or two years, but what&#8217;s happened over the last eight years.”</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Let’s just ignore the tired “Blame Bush” strategy.&#160; This is classic Obama.&#160; Polling of the voters in Massachusetts made it abundantly clear that Brown’s victory was a repudiation, not solely of Obama, but definitely of specific events that have been part of the past year’s orgy of appropriation in our nation’s Capitol.&#160; Still here is Obama, helping the voters understand why they voted the way they did, just in case they didn’t know.&#160; See, our President the narcissist believes that he can say anything and make it be so through the sheer force of his personality.</p>
<blockquote><p>“If there&#8217;s one thing that I regret this year, is that we were so busy just getting stuff done and dealing with the immediate crises that were in front of us, that I think we lost some of that sense of speaking directly to the American people about what their core values are …”</p>
</blockquote>
<p>This was the telling one.&#160; Is he suggesting he embarked on the past year’s grand agenda without knowing or considering the values of the American people.&#160; Doubtful.&#160; He didn’t suggest listening to the American people.&#160; He suggested talking to them.&#160; So I believe his point is far more sinister than that.&#160; He regrets that he didn’t do a good enough job of telling us what our values are or should be.&#160; Again, he believes that through artful persuasion he can change the core of a man.&#160; Frankly, that arrogance pisses me off.</p>
<p>If you look behind a lot of what the President has undertaken this year you’ll see that these aren’t isolated issues that needed fixing.&#160; He is seeking to impose a fundamental change in how Americans act and what they value.&#160; For example, he blatantly seeks to undermine the corporate leaders and prop up unions.&#160; Through “Cash for Clunkers” he attempted to prop up a union-dominated industry in a not too subtle way, by paying citizens to buy new cars.&#160; The last handout attached to the now faltering health care initiative was the exemption for union members.&#160; This wasn’t just to curry favor for the bill.&#160; It was to create a situation that would incentivize union membership.&#160; Screw “Card Check.”&#160; Who needs intimidation when bribery will do the trick?</p>
<p>Of course, in the words above and throughout the interview he repeated that he feels he just didn’t do a good enough job of explaining x to the American people.&#160; For the love of God, NO!&#160; Does this mean that now he’s going to do even more talking?&#160; On the contrary, it’s high time for President Obama to shut up and listen!</p>
<p>Thankfully he won’t … even to save his own skin.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://tsw2.brianjb.net/?feed=rss2&amp;p=1149</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Let&#8217;s Be Clear Who Won</title>
		<link>http://tsw2.brianjb.net/?p=1148</link>
		<comments>http://tsw2.brianjb.net/?p=1148#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jan 2010 01:09:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>brian</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tsw2.brianjb.net/?p=1148</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Scott Brown the Republican did not win last night’s special election for the US Senate seat vacated by the passing of Ted Kennedy.&#160; Scott Brown the guy who isn’t a partisan, out of touch, political hack won. Thank God he knows it.&#160; In his acceptance speech Brown used party labels only once, in talking about [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Scott Brown the Republican did not win last night’s special election for the US Senate seat vacated by the passing of Ted Kennedy.&#160; Scott Brown the guy who isn’t a partisan, out of touch, political hack won.</p>
<p>Thank God he knows it.&#160; In his acceptance speech Brown used party labels only once, in talking about how he will work with Democrats and Republicans.&#160; He saluted Massachusetts independents twice in the opening moments of the speech.&#160; But trumping them all he used “machine” in a derogatory reference to the political establishment, five times.</p>
<p>This was not a victory for Republicans.&#160; It was a victory for the angry and fed up.&#160; If Republicans want to claim a party victory and immediately begin counting November victories, let them.&#160; This will make it that much easier to identify those on that side of the aisle who also need to be shown the door.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://tsw2.brianjb.net/?feed=rss2&amp;p=1148</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Wake-up Call, Schmake-up Call</title>
		<link>http://tsw2.brianjb.net/?p=1147</link>
		<comments>http://tsw2.brianjb.net/?p=1147#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Jan 2010 05:39:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>brian</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tsw2.brianjb.net/?p=1147</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Obviously the big news is Massachusetts. I had two concerns coming into the night.&#160; 1. There was so much focus on Scott Brown winning, that the main message would be lost if Coakley somehow salvaged a narrow victory.&#160; Victory was won and the message sent when President Obama had to run back to Massa-freakin-chusetts two [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Obviously the big news is Massachusetts.</p>
<p>I had two concerns coming into the night.&#160; 1. There was so much focus on Scott Brown winning, that the main message would be lost if Coakley somehow salvaged a narrow victory.&#160; Victory was won and the message sent when President Obama had to run back to Massa-freakin-chusetts two days before the election to try to save a Democrat.</p>
<p>And 2. That this voter uprising would serve as a wake-up call for all of the political hacks in Washington, and allow them to pull out of their self-inflicted nose dive just in time to avoid disaster next November.&#160; Bill Bennett pointed out this morning that victory obscures the message while defeat clarifies it.</p>
<p>Well, #1 is a moot point.&#160; But the fact that Brown won makes #2 even more straightforward.&#160; All year long the Big Government crowd has ignored signal after signal and continued to pursue their hard left agenda.&#160; This was a shot across the bow that can’t be ignored.</p>
<p>Thankfully I don’t believe it is possible to under-estimate a politician.&#160; Early indications out of the White House and Congressional Leadership show a clear willingness to continue to test the limits of voter fury.&#160; I must admit, I’m surprised.&#160; These guys may not have the first clue how to fix health care or the economy, but they do know all about personal survival.&#160; Of course they’ve never had to play the game without compliant voters before.&#160; It’s a sea change for which they are unprepared and ill-equipped.</p>
<p>One last thing:&#160; I’m sick of hearing how Obama is a moderate just because he has done a few things that aren’t ultra-liberal such as parting with the Public Option and stepping up in Afghanistan.</p>
<p>Pfft.&#160; Please.&#160; He may be clueless but he’s not an idiot.&#160; You know, before he was in that one ceremony he was in that other one.&#160; Obama has departed from his agenda only when he had no choice.&#160; To pull out of Afghanistan would have been a disaster.&#160; A very public, highly visible, disaster.&#160; And the public option didn’t have a chance.&#160; He gave up what he couldn’t keep.</p>
<p>But enough of what he didn’t do.&#160; There are plenty of actual accomplishments of note from Barry’s first year on the job.&#160; He has presided over concerted efforts to interfere with business and redistribute wealth, the likes of which hasn’t been for decades, if ever.&#160; He has undermined our intelligence infrastructure leaving us vulnerable.&#160; But hey, the media is all too happy to give him credit for admitting that we’re vulnerable, so it’s all good.&#160; Rogue nations around the world thumb their noses at us and the apology world tour failed to win any allies in an effort to curb them.</p>
<p>In short … moderate, my ass.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://tsw2.brianjb.net/?feed=rss2&amp;p=1147</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Jackson Hewitt, WalMart and Idiots</title>
		<link>http://tsw2.brianjb.net/?p=1146</link>
		<comments>http://tsw2.brianjb.net/?p=1146#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Jan 2010 04:59:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>brian</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tsw2.brianjb.net/?p=1146</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[At WalMart the other day I noticed a sign on one of the little cubicles in the front of the store where Jackson Hewitt does tax preparation:&#160; “9 out of 10 Jackson Hewitt filers receives a refund.” This is not a commentary on Jackson Hewitt.&#160; It’s a commentary on people who get their taxes prepared [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>At WalMart the other day I noticed a sign on one of the little cubicles in the front of the store where Jackson Hewitt does tax preparation:&#160; “9 out of 10 Jackson Hewitt filers receives a refund.”</p>
<p>This is not a commentary on Jackson Hewitt.&#160; It’s a commentary on people who get their taxes prepared at WalMart.&#160; People who treat their withholding like a Christmas Club account.&#160; Every January is like Let’s Make a Deal to them.&#160; January, not April because, you know, it’s OK if the govt holds your money for 12 months, but not 2 1/2 months longer, that’s for sure.&#160; Anyway, each January they know they are getting something.&#160; Whether it’s a wheel barrow full of Jiffy Pop or a pile of cash remains to be seen.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://tsw2.brianjb.net/?feed=rss2&amp;p=1146</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
