We Need a Preemptory Scandal Survey
After an exhaustive search, amidst All Jackson All the Time, I was able to find some coverage of the Sanford scandal. Honestly it had me reaching for the remote … someone’s got to be showing the Beat It video right now.
It’s pretty formulaic. There’s a scandal, they get a bunch of news and political figures on and ask them if the scandalous one should be removed from office. Here’s the thing, and it pretty much always goes this way: people tend to be harsher with their prescriptions for political opponents than for their allies.
“Fwah, fwah, fwah (that’s what gums sound like when they’re flapping), jay-walking is no joke, errr, uuuhh, we owe it to the American public to have this guy drawn and quartered.” Whenever there is a professed sense of duty, look out. Really. After watching them in action, does you really believe any one of them is capable of feeling “duty” anymore.
Or … “Fwah, fwah, fwah, well, you just don’t understand the subtleties of the situation, errrr, uuuhhh, we don’t want to rush to judgment until we’ve had the chance to assemble a bi-partisan commission and conduct a two-year study of what the meaning of ‘is’ truly is.”
Thanks. Thanks all, for the “news” and valuable “insight.”
What we really need to do is conduct a survey of all of these folks when there isn’t a scandal in progress. What should the consequences be for __? If there is a farm animal involved, what then? Doesn’t matter if it’s a Republican or Democrat, are they fit for office or not?
I’ve go to admit, I’m kind of torn. These scandals reveal a lack of character, misaligned priorities and poor judgment. Certainly not the traits you look for in a leader. On the other hand these folks aren’t THE people with poor judgment, they are THE people whose poor judgment has come to light. Everyone has their thing. Knowing human nature, I’m always most suspicious of those who, when calling for punishment, bang the drum the loudest.
So yes, I admit that it’s difficult to navigate these waters knowing one’s own fallibility. But that doesn’t give anyone clearance to flip flop their “values” depending on whether or not the target shares their political affiliation.




I don’t think the draft could have gone any better for Tar Heel stars Tyler Hansbrough and Ty Lawson. No, neither was a lottery pick. That was never going to happen. What both of these guys needed was a good fit, and I say they got it.